Violet’s Tale — Mercy in the Bardcore City
Violets Tale Shakespeare analysis by Ren Gill explores trauma, silence, and mercy in a modern tragedy set in London City.
The closing chapter of Ren Gill’s Bardcore Trilogy is both elegy and resurrection. Set against the grey pulse of 2005 London, Violet’s Tale unspools a tragedy of violence, silence, and fragile hope. It begins in a hospital ward where “a lady down in Paddington is fighting just to stay alive,” then rewinds the clock to reveal how Violet’s pain becomes the origin of Jenny and Screech’s world. This structure—backwards, recursive, redemptive—feels quintessentially Shakespearean. Fate is fixed, but empathy remains possible.
The opening lines read like a prologue: “London City, far from pretty / 2-0-0-5.” Immediately, Ren grounds us in a real year and place, not myth but modernity. The “rhythmic beeps and blood-stained sheets” create a soundscape of life support and heartbeat monitors, replacing Shakespeare’s drum and lute with digital beeps. As in a play, the chorus invites us to witness. To understand the tragedy, we must rewind time for Violet’s tale.
The Silent Girl and the Cycles of Violence
“Violet was a silent girl / Grew up with violent starts.” In two short lines Ren gives us the entire backstory of generational trauma. Her mother drinks; her father abuses. The verse’s rhythm rocks uneasily between lullaby and alarm. When Ren repeats “Every night he’d tuck her tight / But never left the room,” the rhyme becomes weaponised—language used to hide horror. It’s the same poetic compression that Shakespeare used in Macbeth or Othello: beauty and brutality intertwined.
Violet escapes at sixteen, moving to “a semi-detached council flat / Paid for by a welfare-scheme.” Yet freedom only changes the scenery, not the script. The warehouse job, the Tesco shelves, the “boy named Stevie”—each line echoes working-class realism. When Ren writes “History repeats itself,” it’s not just commentary; it’s metrical inevitability. The rhyme pattern itself loops back, forcing the listener into the same trap as Violet. Like Shakespeare’s heroines, she’s bound by circumstance and society’s indifference.
This Violet’s Tale Shakespeare analysis reveals how Ren uses rhythm, rhyme, and repetition to mirror the inescapable cycles of abuse and fate.
The Assault Scene — Sound as Violence
Few moments in Ren’s catalogue hit harder than the sequence that follows. The percussion becomes the punches: “blood splat, bone crack, knick-knack-paddy-whack.” Onomatopoeia merges with nursery rhyme, a chilling mirror of innocence lost. Each line is rhythmic, almost dance-like, recalling the way Shakespeare’s iambic pentameter can carry violence under beauty. The question “Violet, why you always so quiet?” is repeated like a curse—society demanding explanation from the abused, then blaming her silence for the abuser’s rage.
When Ren writes, “That’s the sound of his fists when they fall like a crashing pilot,” the simile extends the metaphor of collapse—human wreckage instead of machinery. The listener becomes witness, unable to look away. Shakespeare’s audience would recognise this device: domestic tragedy played out in real time, the home transformed into theatre of cruelty.
Silence as Defiance
“Well say something, Violet… silence.” The repetition is agonising. Yet within that silence is power. By refusing to speak, Violet denies her abuser’s script. Her muteness becomes the only agency left to her. Shakespeare used silence similarly—think of Cordelia’s “Nothing” in King Lear or Desdemona’s last breathless pauses. Ren inherits that lineage of female characters whose refusal to perform expected emotion becomes rebellion. Violet’s quiet is not compliance; it’s witness.
The Hospital Scene — Tragedy and Grace
The song circles back to the opening refrain: “London City, far from pretty / 2-0-0-5.” Now we understand the full cost. The “lady down in Paddington” is Violet herself, “nine months gone.” The imagery is cinematic—blood, white sheets, frantic doctors—but the dialogue is biblical: “If I’m to die right here tonight / Please let my baby stay alive.” This plea transforms Violet from victim to saint, her final words echoing Shakespeare’s sacrificial heroines. She dies, but her mercy births two children: Jenny and Screech. Life and death share the same heartbeat.
Shakespearean Parallels
Ren’s Violet’s Tale operates like a condensed Elizabethan play. There’s exposition, rising action, climax, and catharsis—all within five minutes. The motifs—silence, repetition, inherited sin, rebirth—mirror the tragic architecture of Othello and Measure for Measure. The doctor and hospital staff serve as the on-stage witnesses who confirm moral consequence. The final line—“A tragedy or a miracle”—is both epilogue and audience cue. We must decide what we have seen: despair or deliverance.
Themes and Symbolism
- Cycle of Abuse: The repetition of rhyme mirrors generational trauma, each beat a bruise passed down.
- Urban Realism: The city replaces Shakespeare’s castle—modern apartments become tragic stages.
- Motherhood and Mercy: Violet’s death births redemption; her silence preserves innocence.
- Colour Symbolism: Blue sirens (Screech) yield to violet dawn — night giving way to fragile light.
Through this Violet’s Tale Shakespeare analysis, Ren Gill reclaims tragedy for compassion. The city that claimed Violet becomes the cradle for rebirth; pain becomes prophecy.
A reflection from The Vault of Ren.
💜 Renflections
In Violet’s Tale, mercy walks through the wreckage — forgiveness where revenge once stood.
Did Violet’s ending feel like peace, punishment, or something in between?
Share what this closing act meant to you.
*trigger warning – some challenging and difficult questions around motherhood that may offend*
It’s easier in many ways to review these stories backwards, because society too often refuses to reflect on what has come before and instead tells us to be “present in the moment”. However history tells us that if we do not pay attention to patterns and evidence from the past, that we are destined to repeat the same mistakes.
The tales, while seemingly narrowly focused on these characters, are still very much a reflection of everything that has come before and how easy it is to make sweeping judgements about people without any deeper personal social/historical analysis. We all recognise this pattern of behaviour in society and the fate of all of these characters has played out so often, that it has become normalised. How is that possible, when so many people not only recognise it, but it clearly impacts on them emotionally when they watch this story play out?
Generational trauma will play out over and over again unless those impacted receive support and empathy from the community to overcome it, so why are we not giving it and preventing these stories from repeatedly happening?
The answers are often painfully simple, because these people are seen as disposable. Without support from their community they become demonised as council estate trash, single mothers, benefit scroungers, mentally ill, addicts..
These people are no different to the celebrities that have mental health or drug addiction issues, they just don’t have the money to pay for their own treatment or to be called “brave” for admitting they had a problem and needed help. Instead they are demonised, and we just accept it… why?
While one person calls Violet a saint for putting her babies ahead of herself, we can also say that if she had survived and had her babies with her, she most certainly would not have been treated as, or considered one.
In a society where there are now people telling women that it is their responsibility to have children (and even trying to force them to keep babies), yet not providing them with the support needed to do so, yet STILL judging single mothers… What are we expecting to happen to these children? Adoption, care systems, these children then suffer and become vulnerable themselves. Was Violet a saint, or did she condemn her own children to their fate by becoming pregnant in the first place despite the awful situation she knew she was in?
These are NOT comfortable questions but once again, the trilogy asks us to REALLY ask what the F*CK we are doing as a supposedly civilised society when we can all see the patterns and we all know how it plays out, yet other than sympathy after the event… we still can’t seem to be bothered enough to stop it from happening?
Why? … it comes back to social constructs and the narratives we are fed. If you care about the fate of these characters, do you care about the real life ones too? This happens every day, across the world, you may just have been conditioned to blame them for their fate instead of recognising the same pattern Ren highlights here?
Aly, this is such a powerful take — you’ve put into words exactly what the trilogy was reaching for. I love how you’ve connected it to how society keeps repeating the same patterns around empathy and judgment.
You always manage to hit that balance between heart and truth. I’m really grateful you shared this one 🗝️